Comments on: Bioidentical Hormones and Hormone Replacement Therapy

By: Macdonnell1

Macdonnell1 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:14 +0000

wattaaa, you will …
wattaaa, you will have to excuse us MD types. We tend to focus on human anatomy and pysiology with a minor emphasis on english. I speak 6 languages so once again excuse us for our slight mishaps with the english language. Btw, I’m always seeking a great editor for my medical journals.

By: WarEagle2727

WarEagle2727 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:14 +0000

What in the …
What in the are you talking about? What “good bacteria” are you going to kill in vegetables? If ignorance is bliss, you are the happiest person in the world.

You shouldn’t type when you have the brain capacity of a fish.

By: theorganichispanic

theorganichispanic — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:14 +0000

You just want to …
You just want to argue regardless. If you want to disagre with my lifestlye, discourage me from eating veggies because of the potential bacteria (ludicrous), hate that I excersise, eat well, and pay attenion to my own health, that went to grad school and working for a living, whatever I’ve done that you off…that’s your problem, not mine. I wish you happiness, health, or intense drama…whatever it is you seek, I’m done with you.

By: angohead

angohead — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:14 +0000

this is one of the …
this is one of the best videos i’ve seen on this channel!!
well done – clear,easy to understand. informative, good examples, know what you’re talking about
keep them up!

By: pongman

pongman — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:14 +0000

I don’t do. I live …
I don’t do. I live off a trust fund.

By: TiaNelson1999

TiaNelson1999 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

You know your stuff …
You know your stuff. Glad to see your willingness to help with HRT. I report on this topic as well.

By: gwho

gwho — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

gay evolutionists …
gay evolutionists have got themselves into quite a conundrum. let’s see if they’re honest as well

By: ephraim0000

ephraim0000 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

‘Homosexuality’ is …
‘Homosexuality’ is not observed in any animals. This is complete unscientific caca that’s perpetuated by humans who have a personal position to defend. Nature weeds out anything that isn’t conducive to the propagation of species. What may be observed is animals in heat jumping on something that resembles a female and attempting to procreate. The impulse is always to PROCREATE and very very very rarely they get it wrong.

By: craaazytaco

craaazytaco — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

From what I know …
From what I know homosexuality has more to do than just simply a biological difference between them and heterosexuals. I have heard that homosexuality is observed in most (if not all) species of animals (or mammals?).

Also I believe, in addition to biological effects on sexuality, there are also situational affects from childhood. That is, there’s a combination of inputs that cause the person’s output to be attraction towards their own gender.

(Replying to awsomescience)

By: awsomescience

awsomescience — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

Maybe can this work …
Maybe can this work on homosexuality ?

By: textkestrel

textkestrel — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:13 +0000

He means the …
He means the naturally occuring enzymes that assist in the digestion of foods.

By: slantythecamel

slantythecamel — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

Actually I said ” …
Actually I said “straight up procreation isn’t the goal, and certainly isn’t….” etc. There is a big difference, the difference being if weaker genes are harmful to the overall species, then straight up procreation isn’t the most successful means… hence why alot of species have non-breeders the same as homosexual, some species have a single dominant male who procreates (like in apes) and the dominant genes push the species further.

Do I need to hold your hand through any more of this?

By: watchme2day

watchme2day — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

“procreation isn’t …
“procreation isn’t the goal and certainly isn’t the most successful means of passing on successful genes for a species.”

Are you a MORON? Procreation is the ONLY way species pass on traits. Even Humans (at this point in time) can only pass on genes through procreation. You sound like you were educated in California.

By: watchme2day

watchme2day — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

Bullshit — …
Bullshit — homosexuality in non-humans was documented by “Homosexuals” trying to build support for their agenda. I don’t care if you are gay but tell the truth. Exclusive homosexual “behavior” exists only in Humans. Homosexuality is about behavior and the FACT that homosexuals can and do have heterosexual sex proves it is behavior not biology. Genetic homosexuality would tend to diminish a species but such observations do not exist.

By: slantythecamel

slantythecamel — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

No point in arguing …
No point in arguing with someone who is willfully ignorant of the facts.

Here’s a scientific fact that you can easily google: homosexuality has been documented in over 450 different vertebrate species.

Just because you dislike the idea of homosexuality in no way refutes the FACTS, and you can say its absurd all you want, the FACTS disagree, end of story. Nothing you say can change scientific FACT. Educate yourself on subjects before letting your personal feelings overwhelm truth.

By: ephraim0000

ephraim0000 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

The gay animals …
The gay animals myth is up there with holocaust denial in terms of absurdity! No good science to support it though a number of gay scientists and ideologically motivated zoo directors have tried. Just because one animal mounts another doesn’t mean it’s sexual. Most of the time it’s an act of dominance. In other words, one male is saying to another that he gets first pick of the females.Everything in nature points towards procreation and survival. I have no position to defend except common sense.

By: slantythecamel

slantythecamel — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:12 +0000

Yes it is actually. …
Yes it is actually. Quite extensively in mammals and birds.

Also, homosexuality is no different in terms of procreation than non-breeders, which are also extensive in many species.
Straight-up procreation isn’t the goal and certainly isn’t the most successful means of passing on successful genes for a species.

I think you should probably look at yourself in the mirror when you say its “perpetuated by humans who have a personal position to defend.”

I bet I can guess what yours is…

By: skinnychic8

skinnychic8 — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:11 +0000

Bio-Identical …
Bio-Identical hormones simply make sense. Good video thank you.

By: emmelawrence

emmelawrence — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:11 +0000

What compounding …
What compounding pharmacy do you recommend? Also, can cytomel (an alternative to synthroid) be given safely via injection?

By: Chamelionroses

Chamelionroses — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:26:11 +0000

I wonder how it …
I wonder how it works on Bonobo Monkeys? They say that Bonobo Monkeys have similar DNA to humans like Chimps.
Still we are a separate monkey. What happens if one is developed with deformed sexual parts to the hormones in time? Is there things science doesn’t know about hormones in creatures? So much to this thing to know.