Rachel Maddow: Bush Rolling Back Reproductive Rights
December 20th, 2009 | by admin |
Rachel talks to Mellisa Harris-Lacewell about the Bush administration’s latest roll back on protections for women’s reproductive rights.
Duration : 0:5:17
[youtube zv7hxb7CVSs]
7 Responses to “Rachel Maddow: Bush Rolling Back Reproductive Rights”
By Snatchbot88 on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
dick cheney WAS …
dick cheney WAS your president dude
his source of power was in being sneaky and doing every thing in the dark
him being president would have forced him to have at leat some credability
By Debatra on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Because if we had, …
Because if we had, Dick Cheney would’ve become President.
By FloridaFormula5 on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
They use this …
They use this insanely corny phrase “women’s reproductive rights” because they try like mad not to say “abortion” because anyone with three working brain cells knows abortion kills children.
Contrary to Rachel, abortion is only “medically necessary” when bringing the child to term would threaten the mother’s life. Such cases are very rare, as everybody knows.
No true pro-lifer would lift a finger to help anybody kill a child.
Tonight’s Homework: The Hippocratic Oath!
By EnjoyMyProfile on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
the democrat …
the democrat congress is holding it back
By Snatchbot88 on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
WTF is wrong with …
WTF is wrong with you people!! He is DESTROYING YOUR COUNTRY, why don’t you impeach him????!!
By SpanishForkOutcast on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
This law is …
This law is terrifying. It’s so loosely written that any person working for the medical facility could deny services for any reason if they claimed it was against their morals. This could be Bush’s last major way to screw up our country.
By hippieCy08 on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
you know, the right …
you know, the right wing Christians of this country have so much in common with the right wing of the Muslims world…..no wonder they hate e/o….both merely has to look in the mirror to see their common ground: hate for anything remotely resembling freedom of choice.